Back to Kriterion
← Reference library

How Many Sets per Muscle per Week?

Training2 min readSchoenfeld et al. (2017); Pelland et al. (2025)

Muscle growth rises with the hard sets you give a muscle each week, with diminishing returns. Around ten or more a week is a sound target for most people.

Key points
  • In a pooled analysis of trials, ten or more weekly sets per muscle grew more muscle than fewer than five.
  • A 2025 meta-regression found gains keep rising with more sets, but each extra set adds less than the one before.
  • Only hard sets count. Warm-ups and sets stopped far short of failure do little.
  • A set that trains a muscle only as a helper is best counted as about half a set.

More sets, more growth, up to a point

Weekly volume, meaning the number of hard sets a muscle gets across the week, is one of the clearest levers for growth. Schoenfeld and colleagues pooled the trials that compared different volumes and found a graded response: ten or more weekly sets per muscle produced more growth than fewer than five. A larger 2025 meta-regression by Pelland and colleagues found the same direction with diminishing returns, so each extra set adds less than the last, and the returns shrink faster for strength than for size.

What counts as a set

Not every set is equal. A warm-up is not training stimulus, and a set stopped many reps short of failure contributes far less than one taken close to it. Analyses of proximity to failure find muscle growth rising as sets get closer to failure, which is why counting only hard sets gives a truer picture than counting everything you logged.

Helper muscles and frequency

A bench press trains your chest directly and your triceps as a helper. In Pelland's analysis, counting helper sets as half a set predicted results better than counting them fully or not at all. The same analysis found that, with weekly sets held equal, how many sessions you split them into made little difference to size, though more frequent training helped strength.

The landmarks are a starting point

The per-muscle volume landmarks many lifters use (the minimum that grows a muscle, the range where it grows best, the most it can recover from) come from coaching practice rather than from trials, and they describe averages for lifters with a few years behind them. A week below them during a deload, or above them in a deliberate push, is the plan working.

How Kriterion uses this

Kriterion's Weekly volume card counts your hard sets per muscle the way this research does: warm-ups out, easy sets out, a helper muscle at half. Premium sets each muscle against its landmarks.

References

  1. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017;35(11):1073-1082.
  2. Pelland JC, Remmert JF, Robinson ZP, Hinson SR, Zourdos MC. The resistance training dose response: meta-regressions exploring the effects of weekly volume and frequency on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains. Sports Medicine, 2025.
  3. Robinson ZP, Pelland JC, Remmert JF, et al. Exploring the dose-response relationship between estimated resistance training proximity to failure, strength gain, and muscle hypertrophy: a series of meta-regressions. Sports Medicine, 2024.
  4. Israetel M, Feather J, Faleiro TV, Juneau CE. Scientific Principles of Hypertrophy Training. Renaissance Periodization, 2021 (the volume landmarks).

Last reviewed 28 Sep 2026 · Next review due Sep 2029

Kriterion is the app this reasoning is built into

It measures your maintenance calories from what you actually ate against what the scale actually did, tells you how firmly the number is pinned down, and checks its own past predictions against your results. Free logging, UK food data, and no ads.